PaulS
- Total activity 27
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 0
- Subscriptions 7
Comments
Recent activity by PaulS-
I made the correction and reran the flow. Still only 50k out of 150k were moved over. I adjusted the page size and batch size to see if that would make a difference and it did not. There are no ...
-
Thanks for the catch - I'll make the change and try again. I had that decrement in there before but took it out as it didn't seem to act correctly for what I was doing.
-
I prepended the "data" to each of the mapping elements and it worked correctly - as you said in the first post! I'm still curious why it works without the "data" in the sales destination and not th...
-
Thanks again... I went and checked, and the production version is also set to "No." I put a debug trace on the production side and see if I can't pickup the equivalent of the sandbox side and post...
-
Thanks for the input, Scott. I have the same mapping on the "sale" that comes through first as shown above with a different form and it completes 100% of the time without the "data" preamble. Tec...
-
No, the flow processes all sales and returns (refunds). Exchanges were the 2nd phase of transactions being added. Because of the way the customer wants to account for the transactions - via cash ...
-
Thanks, both of you! I will leave it as it is and do some testing!
-
So, you are saying that I have the data coming from the export already formed correctly for the API, that I just "pass it through"? I have not tried that nor am I sure of how to do that. I would ...
-
Thanks, Kate. I can't imagine anyone doing the same type of sync that I am trying to do hasn't had the same problem!
-
David,Here is the filter for the condition. My question is will Celigo call this for each record in the array? function filter (options) { if(options.record._PARENT.trans.tran.TransactionTy...