I made the correction and reran the flow. Still only 50k out of 150k were moved over. I adjusted the page size and batch size to see if that would make a difference and it did not. There are no ...
Thanks for the catch - I'll make the change and try again. I had that decrement in there before but took it out as it didn't seem to act correctly for what I was doing.
I prepended the "data" to each of the mapping elements and it worked correctly - as you said in the first post! I'm still curious why it works without the "data" in the sales destination and not th...
Thanks again... I went and checked, and the production version is also set to "No." I put a debug trace on the production side and see if I can't pickup the equivalent of the sandbox side and post...
Thanks for the input, Scott. I have the same mapping on the "sale" that comes through first as shown above with a different form and it completes 100% of the time without the "data" preamble. Tec...
No, the flow processes all sales and returns (refunds). Exchanges were the 2nd phase of transactions being added. Because of the way the customer wants to account for the transactions - via cash ...
Thanks, both of you! I will leave it as it is and do some testing!
So, you are saying that I have the data coming from the export already formed correctly for the API, that I just "pass it through"? I have not tried that nor am I sure of how to do that. I would ...
David,Here is the filter for the condition. My question is will Celigo call this for each record in the array? function filter (options) { if(options.record._PARENT.trans.tran.TransactionTy...
Thanks again for your helpI have another nested array that I need to use to add the "items" within each "tran" to the NetSuite" sale. If I setup the "many" to back up one array as you suggest, the...